Capability
DevSecOps
Speed and security aren't a trade-off when security is built into the pipeline. We automate secure delivery — scanning, policy-as-code, and compliance evidence on every commit — so you ship fast and stay authorized.
Proven where it counts
100+ microservices, event-driven architecture
Accelerated build, deployment, and scaling timelines for a large-scale program by maintaining 150+ AWS EC2 instances and a 90-microservice polyglot containerized platform.
- Java
- GovCloud
- Microservices
Real-time insights across unified systems
Built secure data pipelines connecting Salesforce cloud and on-prem TSA systems, giving decision-makers real-time, actionable insights.
- Salesforce
- Security
- Data Pipelines
API design & development
Accelerated delivery with cost savings for two public-facing API products. Transitioned from Akamai to AWS firewall for a direct cost reduction.
- API
- AWS
- Cost Optimization
What we deliver
Secure CI/CD Pipelines
Automated build, test, and deploy with security gates — SAST, DAST, SCA, and secrets scanning — on every commit.
Policy as Code
Guardrails enforced automatically with OPA and Sentinel, so compliance is checked by the pipeline, not by a review meeting.
Container & Image Security
Hardened base images, registry scanning, and admission control so only signed, vetted artifacts reach production.
Supply-Chain Security
SBOMs, dependency provenance, and signing (SLSA, Sigstore) to defend against the attacks that hit the build, not the app.
Continuous ATO
Control implementation and evidence automated into delivery, so authorization stays current instead of expiring between audits.
Secrets & Config
Centralized secrets management and drift detection with Vault and cloud-native tooling — no credentials in code, ever.
Approach
Security at the speed of delivery.
Security that lives in a final review gate slows everyone down and still misses things. We push it into the pipeline: automated scanning on every commit, policy enforced as code, signed artifacts, and compliance evidence generated as you build. Developers get fast feedback, and authorization stays continuously current.
- SAST, DAST, SCA, and secrets scanning on every commit
- Policy-as-code guardrails, enforced automatically
- Signed artifacts and SBOMs for supply-chain trust
- Continuous ATO — evidence generated as you ship
120-day MVP delivery. Partnered with a prime contractor to rapidly deliver an MVP web application — deployed within 120 days, with speed that comes from pipeline discipline, not shortcuts.
Technologies we work in
- GitHub Actions
- GitLab CI
- Jenkins
- Terraform
- OPA
- Vault
- Trivy
- Sigstore
- SBOM / SLSA
- Kubernetes
Common questions
How does DevSecOps help us reach an ATO faster?
By making authorization a by-product of the pipeline. We implement NIST 800-53 controls as automated checks, generate evidence on every build, and maintain a continuous view of compliance — so instead of a months-long documentation scramble, the ATO package is largely assembled by the time you need it, and stays current afterward.
Why DevSecOps rather than DevOps?
Because bolting security on at the end is where breaches and failed audits come from. DevSecOps moves security left — into design, code, and the pipeline itself — so it runs at the speed of delivery. For federal and regulated work, that integration is no longer optional; it is the expectation.
DevSecOps vs. your cybersecurity practice — which do we need?
They answer different questions. Our cybersecurity practice owns architecture and posture: zero-trust design, security operations, and audit advisory. DevSecOps owns the delivery machinery: the pipeline gates, signed artifacts, and automated evidence that keep every release secure and authorized. Most federal programs need both — advisory to set the target, pipeline automation to hit it on every commit.
Do you work with our existing pipeline and tools?
Yes. We meet you where you are — GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, or a mix — and add security automation and guardrails into what you already run, rather than forcing a rip-and-replace. Where tooling genuinely blocks progress, we make the case for change explicitly.